Why are there so few official live sets of the early years?

Talk about Queen's live performances.

Why are there so few official live sets of the early years?

Postby Ogre T Raylor » Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:33 pm

Live At The Rainbow '74 was a welcome release for sure and helped redress the balance. Before that we had Queen At the Beeb, which wasn't really live anyway. Bur before that we had-

Live Killers (mid career release, with pretty poor sound for an official release)
Live Magic (1986)
Wenbley'86
Montreal '81
Minlton keynes '82

In other words official releases of their later career are much more prevalent. Yet for the majority of Queen fans, their best albums were released from '74-'76. You only have to look at polls here about favourite Queen albums to see that their output from Queen II to A Day At The Races is most highly regarded.

I think I have a theory as to why their 80s shows have been officially released more often, but I'd be interested in what others think....
 
Ogre T Raylor
Spread Your Wings
 
User avatar

 

delete account

      
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:00 am
Gender: None specified
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby soxtalon » Tue Sep 27, 2016 2:31 pm

Easy. 80s shows had the hits. The hardcore fans want 70s. The casual audience who doesn't own any Queen all the way to the non hardcore fan who has a few albums, etc. They are more likely to buy a GH setlist type gig than a early no hits set.

Secondary? Image. Freddie's image to the world is mustachioed and macho. 70s long haired Freddie is not quite as known/marketable

NOTE I'm not supporting this - just think it's in the reasoning behind the scenes somewhere
 
soxtalon
Don't Stop Me Now
 
User avatar

 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:57 am
Location: Albany, NY
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby WeeMann » Tue Sep 27, 2016 2:57 pm

It's possible this could be proved otherwise, but I'd be willing to bet that fewer early gigs than later were recorded (at least, to a releasable standard).
DISCLAIMER: If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a post, complain to me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate.
 
WeeMann
Moderator
 
User avatar

 

Not even on the B list...

      
 
Posts: 6190
Images: 101
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:37 pm
Location: Shropshire
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 147 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby Kes » Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:11 pm

Nevertheless, the mid-seventies gigs that ARE in the archive, are STILL in the archive.

Most of us have heard enough of things like Earl's Court, Hyde Park, and Houston, to know that whatever the band are sat on, is of probably a MUCH higher quality than the bootlegs.

Like a few here, I've got Live Killers (a few times), so would really appreciate it if they released something that helped make it a bit of a wider collection.
What is left of your dream?
Just the words on your stone.
A man who learnt how to teach,
But forgot how to learn.
 
Kes
Moderator
 
User avatar

 
 
Posts: 14558
Images: 747
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:41 am
Location: London, England
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby soxtalon » Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:52 pm

On the other hand if waiting a few more years means a more comprehensive Live Killers Box that Greg has mentioned....than I can be a bit patient myself.
 
soxtalon
Don't Stop Me Now
 
User avatar

 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:57 am
Location: Albany, NY
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby Kes » Tue Sep 27, 2016 10:40 pm

I think it's ESSENTIAL that either Earl's Court or Houston has a full release, preferably BOTH, in their entirety.
What is left of your dream?
Just the words on your stone.
A man who learnt how to teach,
But forgot how to learn.
 
Kes
Moderator
 
User avatar

 
 
Posts: 14558
Images: 747
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:41 am
Location: London, England
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby Ogre T Raylor » Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:10 pm

It's ironic that one of their early shows (which I think was Live At The Rainbow) was seriously considered to be released in the mid 70s as an official live album, but the band and management decided against it. Who knows what reputation it might have gathered over the years if it had been originally released back then! :lol:
 
Ogre T Raylor
Spread Your Wings
 
User avatar

 

delete account

      
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:00 am
Gender: None specified
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby Kes » Wed Sep 28, 2016 7:45 pm

The bootleg known as 'Sheetkeeckers' was from a 'leaked' tape of that particular mix by Roy Baker.
What is left of your dream?
Just the words on your stone.
A man who learnt how to teach,
But forgot how to learn.
 
Kes
Moderator
 
User avatar

 
 
Posts: 14558
Images: 747
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:41 am
Location: London, England
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Re: Why are there so few official live sets of the early yea

Postby AlexKx » Sun Jan 01, 2017 6:31 am

Well, first off "Live Killers" needs to be the fuck cleaned up. It sounds like it was recorded in the toilet.
 
AlexKx
The Show Must Go On
 
User avatar

 
 
Posts: 1770
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 3:43 pm
Gender: None specified
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 23 times


Return to Live Killers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest