Roger wrote:Who decides the ‘true meaning’ of this term? You? Or perhaps the person who coined it?
Because the person who coined it actually has a good etymological basis for it: He believes that feminists have abortions out of spite towards men, and he compares abortion to the holocaust. It’s a stance that’s crass and offensive, but at least follows its own internal logic.
It’s an absurd extrapolation to say that if some ‘snowflakes’ find a term that compares a struggle for equality with mass genocide, we should ban all words because someone might find them offensive. “We can’t compare victims of discrimination to war criminals? Next they’ll say we can’t have black bags or Christmas!”
I think the fact that you haven’t encountered any women who find the term offensive is more a reflection of how hard you’ve been looking rather than of how many women it offends. For example: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/s ... e-proudman
Don't care who coined it. All I know is it is a great word to describe those vile and violent haters. You can get wrapped up in the etymology if you wish - but, beware, you may have to double check the origins of all the words you use in future..saves you looking like a hypocrite then.
You know nothing about feminazis; if you did, you would comprehend that none of their actions have nothing to do with equality...I think you are getting mixed up again (those decent females who want equality are called, wait for it...feminists - and I love those girls).
As for the women I have spoken to? I have spoken to shitloads, bruv - and not one of them gives a single toss about the hating feminazi brigade...but you go ahead and speak for those women too (you do it for everyone else).