The Newest News of the New News Thread

It's New
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Spoiler! :

s

.

Deleted — wrong thread.

So let me get this straight. Now, no one can disagree with anyone else in the same news thread. So whatever is posted in the IITTWC news thread is gospel?

[WeeMann]

So let me get this straight. Now, no one can disagree with anyone else in the same news thread. So whatever is posted in the IITTWC news thread is gospel?

No, it's the childish bickering that we don't want.

[JLP]

So let me get this straight. Now, no one can disagree with anyone else in the same news thread. So whatever is posted in the IITTWC news thread is gospel?

It would also help if people did not post links without some kind of input to what they were on about. Especially those, from both sides of the political spectrum, that have particular bias.

What riles me about this is the fact that the 'childish bickering' (i.e. when some of us disagree with each other) can go on in other threads on this board (with much worse things being stated), but it is conveniently overlooked - depending, of course, on who said it.


Oh, well, there are far more important things to worry about than the trivialities on this site. But, it is dying on its arse...and many simply refuse to post here anymore because of the hypocrisy and bias they see employed on a regular basis.

.

. Edit.

What riles me about this is the fact that the 'childish bickering' (i.e. when some of us disagree with each other) can go on in other threads on this board (with much worse things being stated), but it is conveniently overlooked - depending, of course, on who said it.


Oh, well, there are far more important things to worry about than the trivialities on this site. But, it is dying on its arse...and many simply refuse to post here anymore because of the hypocrisy and bias they see employed on a regular basis.

unless of course, weemann was talking about Roger too, when adressing the childish bickering.

after all, doesnt it take two to bicker?

somehow, i doubt he was addressing both parties.

It does take two to argue, you are quite correct, but as I have learnt myself (no doubt you and others have too), there is no logic at play here; I received my last ban warning because I was arguing with Roger - so, yeah, it takes two to bicker...but if the mods on here take a dislike to you for whatever reason then that logic goes straight out the window.

.

[JLP]

I have not issued a warning for ages. And if this was the Titanic action, you certainly would be below sea level. Cleaning the barnacles off the hull.

I have not issued a warning for ages.

I have not received a ban warning from yourself for quite some time; my warning came from weeman (and it was totally biased and unnecessary).

Anyhow, I'm not going to go on about this; I've stated why I think it's wrong and will leave it at that.

I just wish we could all work together a bit (regardless of our differences) to make this site a more hospitable and welcoming place.

And SMH because I can't respond to anyone's posts in the news thread!